Sorry, your browser cannot access this site
This page requires browser support (enable) JavaScript
Learn more >

🧠 Key Realizations & Updated Thoughts

  • Balancing External Opinions and Personal Integrity

    • Realized the tendency to absorb and react to many (sometimes contradicting) suggestions from others.
    • As a Type 1 personality, reaffirmed the need to stay grounded in personal integrity while remaining open to feedback.
  • Current Research Direction

    • Working on tactile sensing devices for robots, exploring how to connect this with the vision of enhancing mutual understanding between people.
    • Acknowledged the technology’s current application is more robot-focused, while human-centered applications remain ambiguous.
  • Exploration of Human Needs

    • Questioned whether people truly lack tactile feedback tools or if natural senses are sufficient for most.
    • Aware that haptic devices have existed for decades, yet still unsure where the real human need lies.
  • Vision Rationale

    • Belief: As human interactions become more virtual and remote, haptic devices could reintroduce physical awareness and presence.
    • Idea: Transmitting physical sensation from one real-world environment to another (not VR-based).
  • Product Concept (with skepticism)

    • Envisioned a wearable system where one person’s tactile input is felt by another.
    • Compared to existing VR gaming suits, but aimed at physical-to-physical remote interaction.
    • Personally skeptical of the idea’s demand, referring to it as possibly a “fake need.”
  • Potential Application Areas

    • Disability support (e.g., for individuals with impaired physical sensation) seen as a more justifiable use case.

💬 “If I Were You” – Peer Feedback

  • Clarify Your Mission and Need

    • Focus on identifying and articulating a clear societal or user need.
    • Technology is not persuasive without a compelling problem it solves.
  • Explore the Disability Space

    • Several answers naturally shifted toward accessibility needs.
    • Suggestion to lean deeper into the disability context where haptics may truly benefit people.
  • Simplify Communication

    • The concept of haptic display technology needs clearer, simpler explanation.
    • Suggested: Frame it so people can immediately grasp what it does and why it matters.
  • Define Impact for Specific Populations

    • Encouraged to imagine how this tech would meaningfully improve lives for distinct groups.
    • Push to develop clear use cases tied to real-world benefit.

💭 Reflection

  • Stronger awareness of the gap between personal vision and real-world user needs.
  • Committed to exploring disability-centered use cases and improving how the idea is communicated.
  • Still searching for the core mission and need that will justify and focus the work ahead.

留下爪印